Nº 1 in a series.
Battle of the Network Iceblonds
I’m actually Joe Clark. Fake Ouimet is merely a username.
Published July 22, 2008 1:24 pm
The Tea Makers
They offered me the office, offered me the shop. They said I'd better take anything they'd got. Do you wanna make tea at the CBC? Do you wanna be, do you really wanna be a cop?
-
Archives
- December 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
3 Comments
I have sufficient outlets for antijoeclark screeds too, but that’s a stupid justification for censoring a post at Teamakers.
Don’t you also have another blog joe?
Already I’m getting special treatment.
But then I guess I am kind of special.
I’m the only one here not kissing the behind or licking the boots of the CBC hoping for a crumb from the contract position table of government largess, who uses their real name.
Perhaps the Fake Ouimet is worried about the Fake Threat of a lawsuit, over nothing.
You had a different attitude last year joe.
Before you became Caesar.
Allan is referring to a personally insulting post about Tod Maffin that I refused to publish, as it violates the existing published rules about vicious personal attacks.
Mr. T. Maffin is not a sacred cow; the rules apply to everyone.
Allan has sufficient outlets for antimaffinist screeds.
Have I got this straight, joe?
I can criticize the actions of ANYONE involved with the CBC, EXCEPT ONE PERSON.
Is anyone else allowed to criticize the actions of that ONE PERSON?
What utter nonsense.
Where the fuck is the defamatory in my submission?
Where the fuck is the cruel and the hurtful?
Apparently you haven’t spelled out the rules as they relate to your “special” friends.
I can think of another blog that makes new rules as it goes along, without rhyme or reason, in order to present a very phony face to the public.
So Teamakers is no different?